GTK+ Forums

Micah Carrick · Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:06 am Post subject: gtkmm... just getting started.

Hey y'all...

I've never dinked around with gtkmm, but since C++ is the dominant language being taught in schools, I'm considering perhaps switching over from C. The question that comes to mind, is what about all those libraries out there? They would need to have a wrapper in order to be used right? I'm specifically thinking about the GtkSourceView widget.

Micah

openldev · Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:20 am Post subject:

I used to use Gtkmm, but I realized something that should have been obvious in the first place. You can still use Gtk+ with C++, which is what I do. The only catch is that signals have to be friends if you want them to have access to private data members.

The only advantage of Gtkmm is that if gives you the same style of programming as c++ by using classes and namespaces that are wrappers of Gtk+. But, it not only doubled my executable size, but also required my users to install extra libraries. Also, Debian is always behind with the Gtkmm packages, so don't expect to have the most current, or even recently released Gtk+ versions at your disposal through the wrapper without requiring your users to compile Gtkmm directly from the sources.

Wrappers are great for some things, but not for most. And about the wrapper for GtkSourceView, it doesn't exist. There are some amateur projects for it that wrap some of the basic functions, but when I used it, I had to write my own wrapper for it. But then again, you can still use GtkSourceView with Gtkmm by using the Glib::wrap function provided. It will convert it from a GtkWidget* to a Gtk::Widget*.

Disclaimer: Just as a note, I don't mean to insult anyone with my bashing of Gtkmm. It really is a great set of libraries and has its uses. It is just not for me & I wanted to help people to learn from my mistakes so they can make an informed decision. :)

Micah Carrick · Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:34 am Post subject:

In addition to gtkmm, I'm seeing xfcd foundation classes, inti foundation classes and wxwidgets. Are these all just various wrappers and classes to make it "easier" to use C++ with GTK+?

I'd prefer to keep things simple. What does a basic code look like for a C++/GTK+ app which doesn't use gtkmm?

openldev · Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:40 am Post subject:

I've seen the xfcd foundation classes, but haven't ever worked with them. Gtkmm's only purpose is to make Gtk+ commands look like c++. Instead of using gtk_window_set_title (window, "title"), you would use window->set_title("title"). You just have to weigh whether the convenience outweighs the extra baggage. But yes, they are all just convenience wrappers.

As for code for a C++/Gtk+ app, just picture a normal c++ program that calls the Gtk+ library functions. It's just that simple. If you already know Gtk+, then all that's happening is that you're adding the ability to use things like strings, vectors, and other things available in c++. If you want to look at more, you can always go to SourceForge and view my project CVS, which is an example of this concept. The only extra things I have to do is the friend thing I mentioned before & .c_str()'s because Gtk+'s functions require gchar*'s.

Micah Carrick · Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:47 am Post subject:

Cool. I'm glad I asked. That's a better approach for me right now. Thanks.

Amy606 · Familiar Face Joined: 23 Dec 2005 Posts: 5

V Oh please I do not think so.